Re: Google Docs as capabilities as data

Kenton Varda <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <CAJaLmO6_0M1XxT+vkUL=6F-oB=nS6Y6WjnKj-yntELPL16Dgdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote:

> However, *implementing* the webkey-based model (from scratch) is
> (probably) more work than either of the other two and hence why we don't
> see it all that often.
>

I disagree.

First, with webkeys, you don't need a centralized identity authority or
authentication system.  Authentication is pretty non-trivial to implement.
 You can, of course, outsource authentication to Google or Facebook, but I
don't think that counts as "from scratch".

Second, even if you assume a pre-existing authentication system, you still
have a problem when a user wants to share with someone that doesn't have an
account.  As I mentioned earlier, Google Docs offers not just share-by-link
mode, but also "invite tokens", to solve this problem.  The implementation
of invite tokens alone is *at least* as complicated as any multiple-webkey
system, probably more complicated.

-Kenton

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.