Re: Google Docs as capabilities as data
Kenton Varda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJaLmO6_0M1XxT+vkUL=6F-oB=nS6Y6WjnKj-yntELPL16Dgdw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: > However, *implementing* the webkey-based model (from scratch) is > (probably) more work than either of the other two and hence why we don't > see it all that often. > I disagree. First, with webkeys, you don't need a centralized identity authority or authentication system. Authentication is pretty non-trivial to implement. You can, of course, outsource authentication to Google or Facebook, but I don't think that counts as "from scratch". Second, even if you assume a pre-existing authentication system, you still have a problem when a user wants to share with someone that doesn't have an account. As I mentioned earlier, Google Docs offers not just share-by-link mode, but also "invite tokens", to solve this problem. The implementation of invite tokens alone is *at least* as complicated as any multiple-webkey system, probably more complicated. -Kenton _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk