Re: Google Docs as capabilities as data
Dirk Pranke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEoffTCW4dCBxo-jKje-EjzGWpGmeWA=2fgaix3U0YrGZXGm7w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> However, *implementing* the webkey-based model (from scratch) is >> (probably) more work than either of the other two and hence why we don't >> see it all that often. >> > > I disagree. > > First, with webkeys, you don't need a centralized identity authority or > authentication system. Authentication is pretty non-trivial to implement. > You can, of course, outsource authentication to Google or Facebook, but I > don't think that counts as "from scratch". > I think it is difficult to really evaluate the relative complexity of the two approaches, at least without having to hash out a lot more requirements than was my intent to do here. That's why I was fairly wishy-washy in my statements above. You are free to disagree with my hypothesis even so :). -- Dirk _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk