Re: Google Docs as capabilities as data

Dirk Pranke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <CAEoffTCW4dCBxo-jKje-EjzGWpGmeWA=2fgaix3U0YrGZXGm7w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> However, *implementing* the webkey-based model (from scratch) is
>> (probably) more work than either of the other two and hence why we don't
>> see it all that often.
>>
>
> I disagree.
>
> First, with webkeys, you don't need a centralized identity authority or
> authentication system.  Authentication is pretty non-trivial to implement.
>  You can, of course, outsource authentication to Google or Facebook, but I
> don't think that counts as "from scratch".
>

I think it is difficult to really evaluate the relative complexity of the
two approaches, at least without having to hash out a lot more requirements
than was my intent to do here. That's why I was fairly wishy-washy in my
statements above.

You are free to disagree with my hypothesis even so :).

-- Dirk

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.