Re: how goes the capability stuff?
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
5.1 'reasons to use capability URLs' doesn't mention CSRF defense as a reason. That seems odd given how on this list it's often given as the #1 reason to use capabilities. Jonathan On Oct 10, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Daniel Appelquist > Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:04 AM > Subject: Re: how goes the capability stuff? > > Well - we had a discussion on this at last week’s face-to-face TAG > meeting, minuted here: > > https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2014/sept29-oct1/09-29-f2f-minutes.md#capability > > Those minutes contain links to the latest drafts. Jeni Tennison is > busy putting together a final draft based on some additional > suggestions… That draft will appear here: > http://w3ctag.github.io/capability-urls/ and can be tracked here > https://github.com/w3ctag/capability-urls. > > Basically I think we are done and ready to publish this document - and > as I recall, part of that process was incorporating lots of feedback > including from the community you highlighted - but always open for > more feedback. > > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk