Re: how goes the capability stuff?

Please send such good, insightful comments along to the working group,
it would be great for them to get more feedback! Email [email protected]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> wrote:
> 5.1 'reasons to use capability URLs' doesn't mention CSRF defense as a reason. That seems odd given how on this list it's often given as the #1 reason to use capabilities.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Oct 10, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Daniel Appelquist
>> Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: how goes the capability stuff?
>>
>> Well - we had a discussion on this at last week’s face-to-face TAG
>> meeting, minuted here:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2014/sept29-oct1/09-29-f2f-minutes.md#capability
>>
>> Those minutes contain links to the latest drafts. Jeni Tennison is
>> busy putting together a final draft based on some additional
>> suggestions…  That draft will appear here:
>> http://w3ctag.github.io/capability-urls/ and can be tracked here
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/capability-urls.
>>
>> Basically I think we are done and ready to publish this document - and
>> as I recall, part of that process was incorporating lots of feedback
>> including from the community you highlighted - but always open for
>> more feedback.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cap-talk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk