Re: Website CMS questions
Peter Dresslar <peter-6hJmoW3qve0hTx4l/[email protected]> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:46:32 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm not sure we'll actually have a winner to this debate, since it goes back to a time when there was still Star Trek and it was still Good. -Peter Austin, Darrel wrote: >> So the incentive to make the product easy to use and require >> as little support as is possible is built-in. Can you say the >> same thing for a model based on OpenSource (i.e. no licensing >> costs)? I would be most interested in hearing about it! (really!) >> > > Of course you can. Like I said, this can be spun in any direction. > > For the OS spin: > > OS software is a product of developers. Developers who spend time > working on the product not for monetary gain, but for pride. They take > pride in their craft and strive to produce good, solid, usable products > not just to please any specific customer, but to please themselves. > > Of course, the more practical spin is the exact same one you used: > > OS developers don't want to spend time supporting their product anymore > than commercial vendors do. As such, they want to write a good, solid > application to reduce the amount of time supporting end users. > > >>> In the end, make a good product. That's all that matters. >>> >> But that statement ignores the underlying problem: does the >> model promote making a "good product". >> > > I'm not hear to argue whether or not OS is a viable business model. It > clearly is. Just as commercial software sales appears to be a viable > business model. To write one or the other off is just silly. > > >> Indeed... and yet your initial comment was: >> > The only difference between OS and Commercial CMS products >> is that you > pay more for one up front. ;o) >> > > Smilie = typically meant to imply a statement was said partially in > jest/toungue in cheek/not meant to instigate an all out debate. (though > the debate is enjoyable and seems to be fairly civil thus far... ;o) > > -Darrel > > _______________________________________________ > cms mailing list > [email protected] > Subscription controls: > http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms > Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr], [contentmanagers], [cmpros] > http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html > http://www.cms-lists.org > > >