RE: Timeline of CMSs?
"Peter D. Dresslar" <peter-6hJmoW3qve0hTx4l/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c443fd$acaa8620$3d32880a@Phlebas> |
To me content management was always about vetted and categorized information. I think I must have missed it that content management and collaboration are the same things now. -----Original Message----- From: Lennart Regebro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 4:40 AM To: Peter D. Dresslar; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [CMS] Timeline of CMSs? Peter D. Dresslar wrote: > The Notes and Outlook stuff was typically fairly ad-hoc, wasn't it? Absolutely not. > Enterprises weren't really thinking about long term web operations. Web, no, but heck, Content Management is rarely about web, unless it's Web Content Management. Web it just used because it's a client everybody has. With Notes you needed a Notes client up until 95 or so, and then the web integration was a mess...