RE: search engine page rank

"Andre Milton" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general
Message-ID <000e01c47e32$083c2340$6401a8c0@beast>
Darrel knows his stuff.  ;) I'll add a few and return the favor:

- Appropriate filenames:  Google trusts good filenames
- Linked to:  The more pages that link to your page, the better
- Link names:  what you put between your anchor tags is important
- No redirect:  Google hates them... They sometimes work but highly
discouraged especially from the root of your site.  Google might just
skip the rest.
- No flash/shockwave:  Don't expect anything built with Flash/Director
to end up on Google.

It is getting harder and harder to cheat with the google bot.  For
example, black texts on a black background are ignored (old way to hide
content texts you wanted bots to read but not the user).

And once again, I guess this is part of the accessibility stuff, no
dynamic menus/javascript links.

a.

André Milton
www.mlore.com


-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Austin, Darrel
 
If you're talking Google, the keys are:

 - semantic/well-structured markup
 - appropriate TITLE, H1, H2, etc. tags
 - key content as close to the top of the source code as you can
 - good, appropriate, well-written, content
 - other people that deem your content, good, well-written and
appropriate
enough to link to you.
 - accessible design (Look at the recent discussion on accessibility.
Making
your site more accessible also makes it more accessible to google-bot.)

And, yes, Google puts little-to-no weight on traditional meta
keywords/descriptions. That doesn't mean you shouldn't use them, but
don't
count on them for SE rank.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.