Re: Link Management

Robert Koberg <rob-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
cms-list wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:53:11 -0400, cms-list wrote
>  
>
>>On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:43:46 -0700, Robert Koberg wrote
>>    
>>
>>>To me, a redirect is an ugly hack. 
>>>      
>>>
>>What alternatives are available to support for instance obsolete 
>>vanity URLs? 
>>    
>>
>
>I wonder if a good URL rewriting scheme can resolve this - what the webserver
>renders is the new page, but what the browser sees is the old URL with no HTTP
>302, meta refresh, JavaScript or other redirect.  Again, logging of obsolete
>URLs should be implemented so the links referencing them can be updated.
>

The problem I have with this type of strategy is maintainence and server 
configuration. For example, a typical project for us would have, say, 3 
stages/virtual hosts with:

http://dev.projId.livestoryboard.com and
http://qa.projId.livestoryboard.com

on one of our linux/apache servers (we are an ASP) and:

http://www.projDomain.com

either on another one of our linux servers or on some (popssibly 
MSWindows using IIS) machine under the clients control. Your situation 
is most likely different, but the same type of maintainence issues would 
come up if you moved to a different machine, or changed servers (say, 
moving from IIS to Linux). Just seems like some easily forgettable 
headache material.

best,
-Rob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.