RE: Netdoc
James Robertson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6.0.3.0.2.20040428130238.01f4e288@butler> |
At 07:58 AM 28/04/2004, Austin, Darrel wrote: > > It focuses on creating and editing the content, letting the site > > structure > > be done by web developers with PHP. You think that's a good way to do > > it? > >Typically, I think that's the way it SHOULD be done. IAs should handle >architecture, authors should handle content, etc. > >IMHO, a big failing of a lot of CMS systems is that they try too hard to be >web site/page editors as well and, in doing so, fail to fully think about >their content editing and management tools as much as they should. There are many ways of managing content, and assigning roles. I agree that this is a key consideration, and should be worked out beforehand. (For example, I generally get my clients to think in terms of "self-sufficiency (admin)" and "self-sufficiency (development)".) Once you have worked out who will do what, this then becomes an important selection criteria for the CMS. Cheers, James ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd Knowledge Management / Content Management / Intranets http://www.steptwo.com.au/ [email protected]