RE: Anyone use Sharepoint Portal?

"Brice Dunwoodie" <bdunwood-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general
Organization Cylogy, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just a couple of quick thoughts:

- CON: cross-browser support can be weak with SharePoint's out of the box
web parts ....not a big surprise that IE works best.

- PRO: Looking at the third-party add-on market, you can find/pick and
choose some useful extensions

- PRO: .NET web parts are fairly easy to develop and there's a large number
of consulting/engineering/3rd party resources around the core technology. 


-Brice

<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just got back from a 3-day training session on using MS Sharepoint 
> Portal.
> 
> It looks like a nice product. We are going to overhaul our intranet 
> soon and this is one of the contenders for a framework. The bulk of 
> our intranet is office documents, with some custom content here and 
> there.
> 
> Had anyone uses Sharepoint Portal as an intranet toolset? If so, 
> thoughts?
> Pros? Cons?
> 
> >From the short course we took, I came away with
> this:
> 
> Pros:
>  - good user/group/permissions management
>  - fairly decent document uploading, etc.
>  - good content 'pushing' abilities (the ability to notify
>    various groups about updated content)
> 
> Cons:
>  - like a lot of CMS products we've looked at, it seems to
>    do several things 'OK' but nothing 'great'.
>  - lacks a lot of customization (all Table based output,
>    limited navigation control, limited functionality
>    with the built in 'web parts')
>  - Like a lot of CMS products, this seemed like it was designed
>    for one specific task/group scenario and then 'marketed' as
>    a broader product than it actually is.
> 
> Since it's an intranet, the lack of customization isn't as big of a 
> deal to me as it was/is regarding the CMS products we looked at for 
> our public site.
> But the limited functionality of the web-parts seemed to put me off a 
> bit.
> While we really like the user/group stuff, we're not sure if that 
> feature outweighs the fact that we could probably easily develop our 
> own custom set of 'web parts' using our own CMS tools instead.
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Darrel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.