Re: asp-82/[email protected] - Email found in subject - Versioning options
Bryan Johnson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Some systems do just what you are saying - version the binary file and not the attributes. It may make sense in your case. Or you may wish to put business rules around which fields deserve versioning (e.g. page body but not the headline or (if headline does not change but byline does then re-version the entire piece) --- Julian Voelcker <asp-82/[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hilary, > > > To me, it would all be valuable. Versioning can be > a legal issue, so > > I'd advocate for tracking everything that was live > at a given time. > > Thanks, that is useful to know. > > For each page I store the actual core content in one > field and then > have a series of fields for storing the page title, > a short title for > the menus, meta description, meta keywords, teaser > text for putting as > the alt/title text of links to the page. > > Following what you are saying, I think I will play > safe and just store > the lot. > > Many thanks. > > Cheers, > > Julian > > > _______________________________________________ > cms mailing list > [email protected] > Subscription controls: > http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms > Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], > [cms-pr], [contentmanagers], [cmpros] > http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html > http://www.cms-lists.org >