Re: Content Classifications / Taxonomies
Alexander Johannesen <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:10:33 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 6/14/05, Tim Denby <[email protected]> wrote: > Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! > http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tm-vs-thesauri.html I'd also like to point out that one of the stronger messages in that article (and the same would happen if you asked any librarian, too, or me, or Clay Shirky, or any knowledge representation professional) is that taxonomies and other means of simple classification schemes are dead ends. Faceted classification based on thesaurii seems a good option, but really; don't lock yourself into thinking anything can be classified as only one thing. Alex -- "Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know." - Frank Herbert __ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________