Re: [cmpros] How many CMS are there?
"Content-wire Research" <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:12:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000c01c5a407$3352fc10$98cda8c0@paola> |
This is somehow amusing this is one of the main reasons why cm pros started..... we already have a good beginning somewhere, its called the cms feature comparator (on content wire and elsewhere) I have never tested its accuracy, faithfulness, usefulness I would suggest we start a user study of the current cms comparator to test hows its doing, and we could make a plan to develop it from there we may have to develop more facets and find a mechanism to ensure the information is marginally accurate (add a big disclaimer) but the project is fascinating, need to be done about Adrian point, so many that cannot be counted... well some cm are not 'commercial' which means they were not intended to be used by others so that could be a facet (for sale, free to use at your own risk, will consider licensing under the right terms etc) only commercial ones are pushed into the open, it is implied that commercial means under business terms ( have support, documentation, a contractual agreement) it does not mean that the others are not cms, it just means they are not competitive in commercial terms being commercial - that includes open source - means that I expect a level of service with the technology am I right? Pdm > > What would be enormously helpful, I suspect, is to have the systems sorted > by some categorization scheme (hey, we have the taxonomy folks ...), which > means making some sort of decisions around what the categories are. Or > perhaps having a dynamic way that, the way vendors can add their features > in, they can add a category if they've created a hybrid product that > doesn't > fit neatly into one category or another. From a technical communication > point of view, a CMS that handles technical publication content has > certain > features built in that you won't find in a CMS meant for Web content. And > catalogue producers ... it may be publication content, but it's more > Product > Information Management ... perhaps this CM would fit into two categories. > And then there's the newer phenomenon of blogging software becoming robust > enough to become a type of Web CMS for micro businesses. Complicated, but > better than looking at a list of 2,000 and feeling overwhelmed at the > prospect of doing any kind of justice to one's research. > > ======= > Rahel Anne Bailie, Intentional Design Inc. > Performance improvement for communication products > www.intentionaldesign.ca Tel. +1 604-837-0034 > Member: BCTIA, CM Pros, UPA, IAI, STC > > > _______________________________________________ > CM Pros members-only mailing list > cmpros-MANKfPrvENWc44HBJURdtIAH1+cY4lxd2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org > Subscription controls and archives: > http://lists.cmprofessionals.org/mailman/listinfo/cmpros > Archives: http://lists.cmprofessionals.org/mailman/private/cmpros/ > Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cmpros-org], [cms], [cms-forum], > [contentmanagers], [cms-pr] > http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html >