RE: High Volume Open Source CMS Sites
Derrick Oien <[email protected]> Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:53:32 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
When I was thinking about high volume the parameters I was thinking about generally were: 3-5 million pageviews per day with multiple assets per page. Serving 3-4 million 4-5 megabyte files per day. Ingesting into the content management system approximately 1000 4-5 megabyte files per day. My experience was with a top 1000 website and dealing with a CMS that we made from scratch, my hope is that the open source solutions have this sort of scalability today assuming the right combinations of hardware, etc. -Derrick At 09:45 AM 1/8/2004, Rob Page wrote: >On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 02:24, Grant Malcolm wrote: > > Curious to know what might be defined as high volume? ><snip> > >I think this is an excellent question and one that crosses the open >source and proprietary boundary. > >In our experience, there are at least eight scale variables: > > - total size of the managed corpus > > - percentage of the total corpus that's "in play" at any given time > > - retail hits per second > > - content (e.g., page, page fragment, and "object") cache-ability > > - aggregate outbound bandwidth for non-streaming content > > - aggregate outbound bandwidth for streaming content > > - content editor/author/management hits per second > > - system-generated events- or "hits-" per second > (auto keywording, feeds management, etc.) > > - user interface scaling (this is hard to define but important) > >Others? > >-- >Rob Page V: 540.361.1710 >Zope Corporation F: 703.995.0412 > >-- >http://cms-list.org/ >please trim your posts. -- http://cms-list.org/ please trim your posts.