Re: Forms Based sure, but could that mean to a custom DB table?

K. Wasetis wrote:
> Paul, sorry if that was more info that you bargained for.  Most people
> starting with a tool appreciate more versus less.

Oh thanks a lot for more than most, as I said
"but [it] helped none-the-less".

> it is a solid choice from what you've mentioned your
> needs are - all but one, anyhow - workflow.

Oh very interesting! My problem is not an untrusted community or worring
about the style of the site or other editorial policies, but
I will have to consider where I would really want required
review and which stuff would be simply "reviewable".

> If you have serious workflow needs, get ready to extend any of the open
> source cms tools. 

Well maybe my hope is that a typical "(edit/submit --> review/publish)"
is what I need only complicated by the there being the potential
for a mixed community of scholars pushing content into the site.
That is why I thought I look into something that is
already out there.  So it is really an interest in
re-use/leverage of existing tools.

> It's not as automated as I'd like to see,
> but it's more than many of the oscms tools have.

Thanks for that observation re: it isn't automatic, but also
it is more than other osCMSes. I will try to keep that in mind as I
play around with it.

-Paul


--
http://cms-list.org/
please trim your posts.