open office collaboration
Isaac Kriegman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I've been collaborating with a bunch of people on an opensource book for a while now, and I've been considering my ideal application for the process. I'm wondering if such a thing exists or if anybody would be interested in creating it. It will be used primarily by non-technical people, and thus DocBook and tex, even html, is *way* to complicated. I've tried to get people to learn these thing, but for non-technical people the task is quite daunting, and the result is, if the projects depends on these tools it FAILS. The proper solution is to let people word process like they are used to word processing, in a word processor like OpenOffice Writer. The problem with OpenOffice Writer is integrating remote revision control, similar to cvs or subversion. Idealy there would be a plugin for open office which creates an extra menu. When you open a document that is under revision control, the menu appears, and under the menu are the standard items, such as, update and commit. The location of the repository is saved in the document. This makes contributing to the project as easy as downloading an OpenOffice Writer document from the web, opening it, editing and selecting commit from the drop down menu (presumably they would need to enter a username and password as well). Then of course we would need tools for diffing and dealing with conflicts. Some of those things already partially exist in OpenOffice with the local revision control that is built in. Perhaps those tools could be extended. I believe that a really easy to use tool along these lines would revolutionize book writing, and writing in general, in the way that open source software development has revolutionized software development. I've looked far and wide from something like this, but thus far have been unable to find anything. Does anybody like this idea. Does it make sense? Should I describe what I'm thinking about it more detail? - Zac