Re: open office collaboration
"Noah Silva [Mailing list]" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I think this thread might be a tad bit off topic, but: You can do what you are thinking of today. Run subversion as a WebDav service, and run the Ximian OpenOffice.org branch that can save via Gnome-vfs (which works on Webdav). When they save a new copy, subversion will keep the old copy. -- noah silva On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Isaac Kriegman wrote: > > Hi, I've been collaborating with a bunch of people on an opensource book > for a while now, and I've been considering my ideal application for the > process. I'm wondering if such a thing exists or if anybody would be > interested in creating it. > > It will be used primarily by non-technical people, and thus DocBook and > tex, even html, is *way* to complicated. I've tried to get people to > learn these thing, but for non-technical people the task is quite > daunting, and the result is, if the projects depends on these tools it > FAILS. The proper solution is to let people word process like they are > used to word processing, in a word processor like OpenOffice Writer. > > The problem with OpenOffice Writer is integrating remote revision > control, similar to cvs or subversion. Idealy there would be a plugin > for open office which creates an extra menu. When you open a document > that is under revision control, the menu appears, and under the menu are > the standard items, such as, update and commit. The location of the > repository is saved in the document. This makes contributing to the > project as easy as downloading an OpenOffice Writer document from the > web, opening it, editing and selecting commit from the drop down menu > (presumably they would need to enter a username and password as well). > > Then of course we would need tools for diffing and dealing with > conflicts. Some of those things already partially exist in OpenOffice > with the local revision control that is built in. Perhaps those tools > could be extended. > > I believe that a really easy to use tool along these lines would > revolutionize book writing, and writing in general, in the way that open > source software development has revolutionized software development. > I've looked far and wide from something like this, but thus far have > been unable to find anything. > > Does anybody like this idea. Does it make sense? Should I describe > what I'm thinking about it more detail? > > - Zac > > > -- > OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] > http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >