Re: OGo on Debian lenny

> > how is this a discuss(ion) topic? Probably better placed on users.
> I saw that users was aimed at specific support questions, whereas the 
> reason for my message is also the more general issue of OGo and Debian 
> lenny, which now appears quite close to release.
> Looking at http://www.opengroupware.org the last item I see has a date 
> in 2007.  It would be useful to have some more guidance/re-assurance on 
> the future direction of the project, and how should users plan their OGo 
> deployments going forward?  For instance, is InstantOGo now preferred 
> instead of having packages for every version of every Linux distribution?

Agree, the website is terrible.

Packaging requires *packagers*! :)  I am working on supporting the
mainstream server platforms: RHEL, CentOS, and SuSE (Novell).
<http://whitemiceconsulting.blogspot.com/2009/01/opengroupware-package-repositories.html> via the Novell build service.

> I'll put the other issues across to the users list.
> Incidentally, it does seem to be working fine, and it has been a very 
> stable product for me over a long period of time.  If necessary, I can 
> put OGo in a Xen domU of it's own running etch, although I was hoping to 
> build a domU shared between OGo, Funambol and a few other related things.


-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss