Re: OGo/Plone integration

Helge,

On Friday 04 June 2004 23:53, Helge Hess wrote:
> I don't know where you get this from. As mentioned before we are very
> much interested in contributions.
>
> On the other side we a realistic on the possible scope. OGo is quite a
> complex system and this is not easy to get up to speed (well, unless
> you did some serious Objective-C/WebObjects development before).
>
> Maybe you got that wrong from my statement where I said that initial
> development in a closed group is a good thing. 

ok, i found the root of my misunderstanding.

On Thursday 03 June 2004 23:17, Helge Hess wrote:
> OGo being developed
> as a proprietary software by a small team is very consistent from a
> functional point of view.

i read the "OGo being developed..." above as "OGo, that is developed (right 
now)...", while you probably meant "OGo, having been developed (in the 
past)...".

therefore i erroneously thought that you were speaking about how ogo is being 
developed _right now_. just a (non-native speaker) language problem ;)

thanks for the clarification and sorry for the noise,
alessandro
-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss