Re: Alternate offerings
Adam Tauno WIlliams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Morrison Industries |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Code now available from > > http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community/download.htm > > A comparative assessment would be an vital and important tool. Currently no > > time to play or test at this end. > Both the read_me and install notes for those with interest are available here; > http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/chris/altofferings/openxchange/ Last year we had a presentation to our LUG by a SLOX vendor. Personally I think the big differences are: Pro-SLOX: 1.) Roll based administration. Running SLOX in a really complicated organization would be easier than running OGo. Pro-OGo: 1.) An API. Writing integration to OGo is easy, there is no API or easily accessible extension mechanism in SLOX. Thus no way to build any kind of local client support. Other than that 1.) They both use SMTP, IMAP, LDAP, & WebDav 2.) They both support ICAL, WCAP, etc... Personally I like the OGo UI better - it is just about the most production web interface I've ever seen - but that is just a preference. -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss