Re: Alternate offerings
Helge Hess <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 30, 2004, at 21:38, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote:
> 1.) Roll based administration. Running SLOX in a really complicated
> organization would be easier than running OGo.
a) OE is _not_ SLOX. It misses all the administration interfaces
provided
by SLOX and the integration with the carrier Linux.
b) what do you mean by "roll based administration"? I'm not aware that
SLOX provides anything which OGo doesn't provide.
> 1.) An API. Writing integration to OGo is easy, there is no API or
> easily accessible extension mechanism in SLOX.
OE provides something they call a "WebDAV API". In practice it does not
conform to any WebDAV standard but is just "some self invented XML over
HTTP". But to be fair there is "some" API.
> 2.) They both support ICAL, WCAP, etc...
OX does not support WCAP nor does it support Exchange WebDAV. Not sure
what you mean by "etc...".
Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org
--
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss