Re: New Website for opengroupware.org project
Michael Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Folks! My two cents worth... Why throw away something (ie the Plone Docs site and the user docs site) when it only needs a face lift and a tune up? That would be like having to buy a new car because it doesn't have the paint job you want and the engine needs a tune up! I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but there's nothing wrong with using Plone for the Docs, www, and User sites. In fact, it would make things easier, because good content could get migrated from one part (users) to either Docs or www. It's integrated workflow and features will cover off a lot of different needs, once those needs are clearly identified and defined. I started using Zope for my businesses website based on Chris H.'s recommendations (via private e-mails), and I've never regretted it. I've been able to add features and scratch itches by simply adding a few lines of python or DTML to my site. I've now decided that to address other issues (Calendaring/Events, Blogging, and a "clients only" section of the site) that I need to migrate to Plone. I've been looking around, and I am finding lots of stuff about customizing the look and feel of Plone to meet my needs. Now, to clarify a couple of things. Chris has not done any work on my site, and we don't have any business relationship. He gave me some REALLY GOOD ADVICE about looking at Zope/Plone, and I did the rest on my own. There's a lot of stuff out there, and google's been my best friend! I've been happy with Zope, and I'm actively playing with customizing Plone (as a beginner to Plone), and I've never regretted using it. And I have to PAY someone else to do my Zope/Plone hosting for me. Secondly, why not give Chris the access he needs to fix the current issues with the Plone sites? Why throw the baby out with the bathwater? That's my biggest concern with suddenly trying to migrate off Plone onto something else; it's more efficient for the project to have 20 people working on ONE solution, than to have 20 people working on a dozen DIFFERENT solutions. Not to mention the loss of all the work end users have done on the Users site. So, that's my opinion as a small business owner and end user of OGo, for what it's worth. Let's hope we can settle this quickly and in the most CIVIL of fashions, because we don't want to loose any volunteers. I've spent almost 20 years working in various volunteer organizations, and the one thing that everyone wants is to be personally - and have their work - appreciated. Hope that helps! /Mike --- chris h <[email protected]> wrote: > > this can be done via plone...perhaps not the > existing install version as it > now very dated but can easily be done. The entire > home page and versions are > kept in one user account (which can now be shared > via groups and is > accessible via webdav, ftp and xml-rpc) and via a > redirect in apache becomes > xxxxx.opengroupware.org or just simple > opengroupware.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss