Re: xxx.OGo.org Websites
chris h <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On June 27, 2005 03:54 pm, Helge Hess wrote: > The bad thing is that this thread is moving from the suggestion on a > simple and pragmatic system like a Wiki to providing a full featured > super cool and well thought out website CMS. > Which isn't something I need to have. Our focus is doing groupware, > not websites and I would like to see pragmatic solutions for issues I > have _now_. Ok I took the PM off to play with this issue to get it sorted once and for all. After looking at the code in svn I see the problem. Its not a trivial system nor is the structure self evident. There seem to be far too many templates that over ride and over ride base values, hence the time required to walk and process the code base. So I copied the structure and loaded some demo data into latest release of plone and intentionally focused on usability and code management issues.Plone 2.1 goes gold later this week. No UI elements added at all. This is intentional as there are two accounts available for testing, test admin and test user. Coordinates will be sent to the appropriate people for review off list. The intend is to focus on usability and content production/management not design at this stage. The purpose here is not to discuss rather to demonstrate content production. In short, content can be created in a miriad of ways including integration of local editors (thats what the pencil is for in the admin access area but you need to install an app and windows/linux/mac are supported) Content can be uploaded via ftp, webdav and or reworked via the web interface if you prefer via epoz (see preferences in your accounts to activate it) On the feature side there is now complete revision management (ie history), user level shared access, as well as user and group admin if you are the admin. Of course the integrated email notification system remains in place (not active) at this time. However content production and maintenance are more important then features. Both the workflow and stagging are default as supplied as they come with some significant changes. Should meet the requirements, Finally its sitting on my laptop, plane zope no apache, no caching and no RAM cache and no db optimizations. Loads in less the 2 sec's at this end which is the same as slashdot, linuxtoday or opengroupware.org YMMV. However wrt to speed I have no concerns as I know what this can do as its proven itself commercially. The only caveat I offer is that I will be unavailable from July16 to approx 20 Aug so if you need a wiki solution then feel free. Wrt to a wiki based system for docs.opengroupware.org well that would be ...unproductive..:) The current thinking on this to move the data into a structure similar to http://plone.org/documentation in late Aug or Sept. Data migration can be done by one person but maintenance will require a crew. Regards /ch -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss