Re: [oscom oc-3] Re: Twingle, SlideML, SoftwareML & Sprint
Roger Fischer <roger.fischer-zfZwwz/hh/[email protected]> Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:24:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom.twingle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Paul > > I think the Twingle project is well on it's way. > > Chregu commited to work on that 100% during the sprint. > > > > I would like to dedicate myself to SlideML let's say at 70%. > > The rest percentage can be used for either Twingle or SoftwareML. >=20 > Wonderful. I view the two projects as related in the future. +1 or so am I. > > The first day I want to finish finally the Schema for SlideML 1.0. > > So if you need me for Schema questions, please tell me now. >=20 > I think we plan to stick to an xhtml schema at first. That's a tough one - see the sheer complexity of XHTML Schema. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-m12n- schema/schema_module_defs.html#a_schema_module_defs=20 Or should we just take some modules? > > The second day I want to focus on SlideML authoring - maybe there is = a > > bridge to Twingle. >=20 > Yes indeed, last night I was busily writing the perfect XBL-interface=20 > to a SlideML authoring tool. Unfortunately I was sleeping while this=20 > happened and thus lost the sources. :^) >=20 > Seriously, take a look at: >=20 > http://xulplanet.com/tutorials/xultu/xblex.html I checked quickly. I need more time. Anywys thanks for the hint. >=20 > ...for an illustration of how this might be implemented. Combine this=20 > with a *really* simple way to Locate/Create/Collaborate (a=20 > Presentations folder automatically appearing in your Twingle "Personal=20 > Folder"), and leveraging RDF to easily find individual slides sitting=20 > out there in the RDF soup...pretty cool. >=20 > > At the end of the day, it should be possible for authors to enter the= ir > > proposals and get SlideML out of it, as well as a HTML abstract page. > > I already have a prototype, but it needs some polishing. Also the=20 > > authoring > > part and the transfer to the OSCOM site is not implemented yet. >=20 > Right. >=20 > > As you may have seen, I and Bob had a conversation about CMS > > Features/SoftwareML. > > I don't know how you (mainly Gregor, as you are the Editor) see this=20 > > project > > in respect to the Zurich Sprint? > > > > I think it would be cool if anybody could commit quickly to what he=20 > > intends > > to do during the sprint. >=20 > I still hope, today, to stir up some movement on this. I want to make=20 > sure we don't all just show up in the same place and read emails for=20 > two days. >=20 > > Btw: I would love to have somebody on the SlideML authoring boat. >=20 > Authoring, or authoring tool, or... >=20 > > PS: If you need me in regard to RDF/RDF Schema, either for Twingle or > > SoftwareML, I also would like to know it beforehand. >=20 > Hmmm...is it possible to write an RDF Schema validator in JS? =20 No idea. Something to pursue? I can do some research if needed. How=20 > different would it be from what you did in Bitflux for XSD? > In BXE, Chregu did almost all, even the XSD part. Roger >=20