Re: [oscom oc-3] Re: Twingle, SlideML, SoftwareML & Sprint

Roger Fischer <roger.fischer-zfZwwz/hh/[email protected]> Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:24:53 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.oscom.twingle.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Paul

> > I think the Twingle project is well on it's way.
> > Chregu commited to work on that 100% during the sprint.
> >
> > I would like to dedicate myself to SlideML let's say at 70%.
> > The rest percentage can be used for either Twingle or SoftwareML.
>=20
> Wonderful.  I view the two projects as related in the future.
+1 or so am I.

> > The first day I want to finish finally the Schema for SlideML 1.0.
> > So if you need me for Schema questions, please tell me now.
>=20
> I think we plan to stick to an xhtml schema at first.
That's a tough one - see the sheer complexity of XHTML Schema.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-m12n-
schema/schema_module_defs.html#a_schema_module_defs=20

Or should we just take some modules?


> > The second day I want to focus on SlideML authoring - maybe there is =
a
> > bridge to Twingle.
>=20
> Yes indeed, last night I was busily writing the perfect XBL-interface=20
> to a SlideML authoring tool.  Unfortunately I was sleeping while this=20
> happened and thus lost the sources. :^)
>=20
> Seriously, take a look at:
>=20
>    http://xulplanet.com/tutorials/xultu/xblex.html

I checked quickly. I need more time. Anywys thanks for the hint.
>=20
> ...for an illustration of how this might be implemented.  Combine this=20
> with a *really* simple way to Locate/Create/Collaborate (a=20
> Presentations folder automatically appearing in your Twingle "Personal=20
> Folder"), and leveraging RDF to easily find individual slides sitting=20
> out there in the RDF soup...pretty cool.
>=20
> > At the end of the day, it should be possible for authors to enter the=
ir
> > proposals and get SlideML out of it, as well as a HTML abstract page.
> > I already have a prototype, but it needs some polishing. Also the=20
> > authoring
> > part and the transfer to the OSCOM site is not implemented yet.
>=20
> Right.
>=20
> > As you may have seen, I and Bob had a conversation about CMS
> > Features/SoftwareML.
> > I don't know how you (mainly Gregor, as you are the Editor) see this=20
> > project
> > in respect to the Zurich Sprint?
> >
> > I think it would be cool if anybody could commit quickly to what he=20
> > intends
> > to do during the sprint.
>=20
> I still hope, today, to stir up some movement on this.  I want to make=20
> sure we don't all just show up in the same place and read emails for=20
> two days.
>=20
> > Btw: I would love to have somebody on the SlideML authoring boat.
>=20
> Authoring, or authoring tool, or...
>=20
> > PS: If you need me in regard to RDF/RDF Schema, either for Twingle or
> > SoftwareML, I also would like to know it beforehand.
>=20
> Hmmm...is it possible to write an RDF Schema validator in JS? =20

No idea. Something to pursue? I can do some research if needed.

How=20
> different would it be from what you did in Bitflux for XSD?
>
In BXE, Chregu did almost all, even the XSD part.
Roger
>=20