Re: [OSCOM] New paper on DMS's - no Fedora?
Seth Gottlieb <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:43:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Paul, I looked at Fedora a while ago and my impression was that it is primarily a repository on which to build applications like Digital Asset Management system. Here is the URL. http://www.fedora.info/ If someone knows otherwise, please step forward. ;) Plone is frequently used as a DMS and as a WCM. It is not the best pure DMS but if you like the other features, you might be able to tolerate Plone's shortcomings as a DMS. --Seth Paul D. Bain wrote: > Seth Gottlieb wrote: > >> I just wanted to let you all know that my colleague, Sebastian >> Wohlrapp, and I just published a new white paper on Open Source >> Document Management Systems. >> The following projects were evaluated: >> * Alfresco >> * Contineo >> * CPS (Collaborative Portal Server) >> * KnowledgeTree >> * Owl >> * Plone >> * Open sTeam > > > Thanks for doing all of this hard work. I appreciate it. I would > like to why you chose not to review Fedora, another OSS DMS. It > appears to be quite mature, but is not a CMS -- it is a DMS. Plone is > mostly a CMS, correct? > > I do not have an URL for Fedora right now. > > --Paul Bain > >> We evaluated the projects along the following dimensions: >> * Creating and storing content >> * Organizing content and collaboration >> * Search and accessing content >> * Usability >> >> Here is the link: http://www.optaros.com/wp/wp_6_os_docManagement.shtml >> >> As usual, feedback is welcome. > -- Seth Gottlieb Optaros, Inc. 60 Canal Street Boston, MA 02114 e: [email protected] v: 617.227.1855 ext. 107 f: 617.227.1755 m: 617.852.2956 b: http://contenthere.blogspot.com