Re: [OSCOM] FYI: Welcome new OSCOM members, status on existing

So, you are saying those who volunteered as members are up for board? 
Member as in board member?
 From what I understood is that to jump-start, you needed new members, 
by-laws. By OSCOM definition, we still have old members deciding things.

So, we are back to square one?  I expected one way or another we will 
hear "next step" and I am still expecting myself volunteering for 
keeping OSCOM alive. But nothing seemed to have happened.

 Everitt wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:04 PM, kit BLAKE wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>   
>> Am I correct in interpreting this as: we're in a wait state, seeing if
>> any list members will contact Paul and become OSCOM members?
>>     
>
> We might be in a wait state, but not because of people contacting me  
> about membership. :^)
>
> IMO, the "DISCUSS: Getting a new board in place" is the current wait  
> state:
>
> 1) Do people agree on the idea of using a board election to test  
> whether OSCOM-the-entity can be revived?
>
> 2) If so, how might the nomination and election process work (since  
> the bylaws are, I think, silent on that)?
>
> 3) Finally, does anybody want to work with me as part of an election  
> committee, to conduct the process agreed to in (2)?  Obviously you  
> shouldn't be a candidate if you are on the election committee.
>
> --Paul
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general