Re: [OSCOM] FYI: Welcome new OSCOM members, status on existing
Alex Kempkens <Alex.Kempkens-1bhwm9BsUthR5dUNPGT/[email protected]> Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:05:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There is a solution based on Skype which allows closed conferences between more than 4 people. http://www.highspeedconferencing.com/ If you plan such a conference I'm willing to be available for it. Alex Chalu Kim schrieb: > Ok, reading your response backward > > We will need to make an effort to at least speak to each other or > introduce ourselves. Can you use conferencing using Skype or Asterisk? > > If that satisfies us having met, does that ratify our becoming bylaws? > Or does that have to be in-person meetings? > > Then what? we the members put people up for board election? The board > members by nature are custodians not the law makers. Board has > something to do with raising money normally and has a say in how money > is spent. Then, members and board are antagonistic which is helpful. > Members will want to put new ideas and boards can strike them down or > advise and change. We need a pundit who will explain according to the > past bylaws. > > So, after we elect the board, can members decide new bylaws and enable > new steering party? > > Members will take from that point on. > > Paul Everitt wrote: >> On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Chalu Kim wrote: >> >> >>> So, you are saying those who volunteered as members are up for >>> board? Member as in board member? >>> >> >> The member (both previous and in the new list posted today) get to >> vote for the board, if I understand the bylaws correctly: >> >> http://www.oscom.org/get-involved/organization/bylaws.html >> >> I don't think there is a process for saying how people get nominated >> for the board election. I also don't think membership is required to >> serve on the board. >> >> On the latter...when I said "member" I meant "OSCOM Member" as >> defined in Article 3 of the bylaws. >> >> >>> From what I understood is that to jump-start, you needed new >>> members, by-laws. By OSCOM definition, we still have old members >>> deciding things. >>> >> >> The list of old members is here: >> >> http://www.oscom.org/get-involved/organization/members.html >> >> This is augmented by the new list I sent around today, which adds to >> the membership. Thus "we still have old members deciding things" is >> not correct. >> >> Yes, we need new bylaws. But bylaw changes can't happen by fiat. >> You need an active membership (e.g. shows up for annual meetings) and >> active board. Thus my effort to get enough new blood into the legal >> entity that can legally fix things. >> >> --Paul >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general -- Think Network GmbH, Munich Germany eMail: Alex.Kempkens-1bhwm9BsUthR5dUNPGT/[email protected] Web: http://www.thinknetwork.com FP: CD7B C1F1 C2F8 8CF2 1689 8C33 0131 BADF 4E7E 0267