Re: [OSCOM] FYI: Welcome new OSCOM members, status on existing

Chalu Kim <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:57:39 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.oscom
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ok, reading your response backward

We will need to make an effort to at least speak to each other or 
introduce ourselves. Can you use conferencing using Skype or Asterisk?

If that satisfies us having met, does that ratify our becoming bylaws? 
Or does that have to be in-person meetings? 

Then what? we the members put people up for board election?  The board 
members by nature are custodians not the law makers.  Board has 
something to do with raising money normally and has a say in how money 
is spent. Then, members and board are antagonistic which is helpful. 
Members will want to put new ideas and boards can strike them down or 
advise and change. We need a pundit who will explain according to the 
past bylaws. 

So, after we elect the board, can members decide new bylaws and enable 
new steering party?

Members will take from that point on.

Paul Everitt wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Chalu Kim wrote:
>
>   
>> So, you are saying those who volunteered as members are up for  
>> board? Member as in board member?
>>     
>
> The member (both previous and in the new list posted today) get to  
> vote for the board, if I understand the bylaws correctly:
>
>    http://www.oscom.org/get-involved/organization/bylaws.html
>
> I don't think there is a process for saying how people get nominated  
> for the board election.  I also don't think membership is required to  
> serve on the board.
>
> On the latter...when I said "member" I meant "OSCOM Member" as  
> defined in Article 3 of the bylaws.
>
>   
>> From what I understood is that to jump-start, you needed new  
>> members, by-laws. By OSCOM definition, we still have old members  
>> deciding things.
>>     
>
> The list of old members is here:
>
>    http://www.oscom.org/get-involved/organization/members.html
>
> This is augmented by the new list I sent around today, which adds to  
> the membership.  Thus "we still have old members deciding things" is  
> not correct.
>
> Yes, we need new bylaws.  But bylaw changes can't happen by fiat.   
> You need an active membership (e.g. shows up for annual meetings) and  
> active board.  Thus my effort to get enough new blood into the legal  
> entity that can legally fix things.
>
> --Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general