[OSCOM] governance, wiki
[email protected] Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:18:04 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Renaud, below made me think of something important > Bob told > me that Sandro Groganz approved the general idea and said that every > OSCOM member IS OSCOM " every OSCOM member is OSCOM" great! sounds good to me Provided it gets approval by the OSCOM community on collective activities I dont think anyone should do anything unless it has been discussed/approved by the community in some form. And I dont mean approved by the 'board' or a selection of friends who may support each other interests - this is what happens in politics a lot - but approved as 'discussed' in a democratic open forum (such as this list). One of the problems that can arise when things are done in the open is that decisions are sometimes not made. People argue and argue and can become bitter and nothing ever gets done. We need to strike a balance between being open to (constructive) discussions, and getting things done - agreed on that. People should take initiative, and should encourage others to participate where there is a constructive compatibility and/or to take other initiatives But unless we crack the 'online democracy' nut by allowing community participation and seeking some level of consensus at all, we have lost the online community battle. - OSCOM is an online community, right? I am sure there many on this list - on the internet, in the world - who are working hard to make things happen on the internet as a free, creative, open space. Their primary goal is knowledge creation and sharing values - and the pie. I am equally sure that there are a people whose primary goal is making money and gaining fame, and knowledge sharing is just a marketing tool for them. This is why I think we need to work out our rules before we start to play. I myself hope we can find an open system for self governance - so that potential conflicts can be combed out before we get caught in I suggested earlier that we try a clear mission/goals, also obviously we need a roadmap (interoperability, CMSML, what you guys have in mind) And some truly open and robust self-governance rules, perhaps Let me remind everybody that we now have a great WIKI where after discussing your ideas you should also be posting Please all OSCOM members old and new enter a profile and some vision and ideas so that we can get to know each other - http://www.oscom.org/wiki or http://wiki.oscom.org/tiki-index.php Cheers PDM