Re: [OSCOM] Reminder: Public email for OSCOM board
Chalu Kim <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:18:32 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We are just getting through a phase now. It won't be old boys. We will solicit opinions and get more people involved. That is the consensus anyway. Steven Noels wrote: > On 15 Sep 2006, at 19:22, Chalu Kim wrote: > > >> You need to first volunteer to be a member and then step forward. Are >> you on the list first assembled? >> >> Paul, do you have the list? >> > > Pardon my interruption, but I assume this might be one of the issues > with OSCOM in its current state: I've been lurking on this list for a > while now, and suspect it is tough for newcomers to walk in without > assumptions or knowledge of the past. Hence they don't necessarily > feel welcome at all - old boys networks and such. > > We (*) have been building an open source CMS for three years now, > shipping one for two years, with 6 non-trivial releases so far. We've > build a small but thriving business around it. We also build a small > but thriving community around it, and contributions are starting to > appear. Also, more than 50% of our core product development has been > funded directly by customers: they pay us for doing open source > development. > > My hunch would thus be that OSCOM should be of major interest for us. > Yet, I don't know. > > (*) We, that's a tiny Belgian four-person company, which has got were > it currently is without much involvement with industry or open source > consortia, standardisation efforts, without external capital nor much > press attention. Yet, we have two non-trivial publicly traded US > customers, and quite a few large local ones. > > In terms of "real" open source community development, we build, > donated and supported stuff to the Apache Cocoon community that is > now in use by all of the Cocoon users, including our competitors in > the OSS space. Out of the four of us, two are Apache Foundation > members, and three are Apache committers. So it's not that we don't > "get open source". > > It's that we don't "get" what OSCOM could do for us. CMPros, yes, I > can figure that one out. > > So what are our options? Help to make the new OSCOM into something > that is useful to our and the community's purposes? If so, how do we > get in? Will we feel welcome? Will OSCOM-NG again be Zurich- and > Boston-centric? Who gets to decide the overall strategy: members or a > board? > > Regards, > > </Steven> > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general