Re: [OSCOM] Reminder: Public email for OSCOM board
Martin Bähr <mbaehr-J82dVEKiPgVsIEQYbtjsvCEcasqEdqbRs2V0tQ3P5b8@public.gmane.org> Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:23:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:56:39PM +0200, Steven Noels wrote: > Pardon my interruption, but I assume this might be one of the issues > with OSCOM in its current state: I've been lurking on this list for a > while now, and suspect it is tough for newcomers to walk in without > assumptions or knowledge of the past. Hence they don't necessarily > feel welcome at all - old boys networks and such. yes, definetly. on a mailinglist it is not easy to know when someone is new anyways, and the current state, trying to get a reorganization going is also very inward focused, and therefore not inviting. > Also, more than 50% of our core product development has been funded > directly by customers: they pay us for doing open source development. good model, i like going by that too :-) > My hunch would thus be that OSCOM should be of major interest for us. > Yet, I don't know. [ ... ] > It's that we don't "get" what OSCOM could do for us. yes, we are struggling with the same issue here. i pointed my partner to oscom, suggesting that, if there is something that would be of mutual benefit by working with oscom, then now, while the reorganization happens, would be a good time to get involved, to help shape oscom into something where oscom and we can benefit. > CMPros, yes, I can figure that one out. but i can't, what's cmpros? :-) > So what are our options? Help to make the new OSCOM into something > that is useful to our and the community's purposes? yes, that sounds like a good idea. > If so, how do we get in? part of the reorganization should be that 'getting in' will be made easier. at least that is my expectation. > Will we feel welcome? being welcome is a people thing. whether you feel welcome will mostly depend on how you get along with the rest of us. > Will OSCOM-NG again be Zurich- and Boston-centric? Who gets to decide > the overall strategy: members or a board? again my expectation is, that it will be member centric and that members decide the strategy while the board handles the legal issues. greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world -- pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/