Re: [OSCOM] bylaw and organisational changes
Chalu Kim <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:47:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0577865605== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050407000605080101030705" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050407000605080101030705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry I was using a PDA and it was a bad idea. I have a problem with "by default". We could "invite every known free software CMS and publishing and blog and DMS whatever developers". More like "call for participations" instead of exhaustive invitation with wording of "by default" We love to have them, sure. On this friendly invitational approach, it is great. In terms of image of the organization, it would be nice not to be just developer-led but user-led as well. Ross is another board member who expressed similiar sentiment. Ross, any comment? Or this weekend is holiday for some and I will stay low and pick on Monday. Andrea Resmini wrote: > Chalu, > > >>>> i'd like to see a representative from every free software content >>>> managment project out there. these projects should be invited and be >>>> members by default. (one vote per project) >>>> >>> +1 >>> >> -1 >> > > Could you elaborate on this? Why do you see this as possibly negative? > > >>>> this should encourage acceptance of oscom as an umbrella organization >>>> for all free software content managment projects. it would help raise >>>> awareness about oscom within those projects and put us in a much better >>>> position with regards to establishing standards that are accepted by >>>> all. >>>> >>> +1 >>> > > >> this is too developer-centric. >> -1 >> > > Again, it might be (although I do not see that as a negative), but what > exactly is your vision then? > > -- > > Andrea Resmini > vector-qiE7/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > --------------050407000605080101030705 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Sorry I was using a PDA and it was a bad idea.<br> <br> I have a problem with "by default". <br> <br> We could "invite every known free software CMS and publishing and blog and DMS whatever developers". More like "call for participations" instead of exhaustive invitation with wording of "by default"<br> <br> We love to have them, sure.<br> <br> On this friendly invitational approach, it is great.<br> <br> In terms of image of the organization, it would be nice not to be just developer-led but user-led as well. Ross is another board member who expressed similiar sentiment. <br> <br> Ross, any comment?<br> <br> Or this weekend is holiday for some and I will stay low and pick on Monday.<br> <br> Andrea Resmini wrote: <blockquote cite="mid451429B9.9070708-qiE7/[email protected]" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Chalu, </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">i'd like to see a representative from every free software content managment project out there. these projects should be invited and be members by default. (one vote per project) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">+1 </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">-1 </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> Could you elaborate on this? Why do you see this as possibly negative? </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">this should encourage acceptance of oscom as an umbrella organization for all free software content managment projects. it would help raise awareness about oscom within those projects and put us in a much better position with regards to establishing standards that are accepted by all. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">+1 </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">this is too developer-centric. -1 </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> Again, it might be (although I do not see that as a negative), but what exactly is your vision then? -- Andrea Resmini <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vector-qiE7/[email protected]">vector-qiE7/[email protected]</a> _______________________________________________ General mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general">http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------050407000605080101030705-- --===============0577865605== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general --===============0577865605==--