Re: [OSCOM] bylaw and organisational changes
Chalu Kim <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:50:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0820296579== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040100020704050807070009" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040100020704050807070009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know if it is a bad thing to pay a bit and support a good cause. The more you are involved, the more likely you are positive. Revitalize yes but we need a sustainable model. Look at SIGGRAPPH. It is non-profit with huge following. Andrea Resmini wrote: > Chalu, > > >> what if you pay money or provide some work? Both are good. It has to do >> with a sense of ownership >> > > As I said in my previous message, I understand your point perfectly, > it's not something I'm opposing on ideological ground. > > I just think that given that our current task is to try revitalize > OSCOM, fees and / or duties could possibly result in not being able to > get a sufficient number of people involved (fees) or in spending a lot > of organizational resources to check compliance (duties), as Martin > explained (much better than I ever could). > > -- > > Andrea Resmini > vector-qiE7/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > --------------040100020704050807070009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <br> I don't know if it is a bad thing to pay a bit and support a good cause.<br> The more you are involved, the more likely you are positive.<br> <br> Revitalize yes but we need a sustainable model. Look at SIGGRAPPH. It is non-profit with huge following.<br> <br> Andrea Resmini wrote: <blockquote cite="mid451427BD.4000803-qiE7/[email protected]" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Chalu, </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">what if you pay money or provide some work? Both are good. It has to do with a sense of ownership </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> As I said in my previous message, I understand your point perfectly, it's not something I'm opposing on ideological ground. I just think that given that our current task is to try revitalize OSCOM, fees and / or duties could possibly result in not being able to get a sufficient number of people involved (fees) or in spending a lot of organizational resources to check compliance (duties), as Martin explained (much better than I ever could). -- Andrea Resmini <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vector-qiE7/[email protected]">vector-qiE7/[email protected]</a> _______________________________________________ General mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general">http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------040100020704050807070009-- --===============0820296579== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general --===============0820296579==--