Re: [OSCOM] Open source CMS / documents are content/
"Content-wire Research" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004e01c52ac8$a1ca1b50$4bfefea9@paola> |
Thanks for the opportunity to discuss CMS and DM, as it has been bugging me lately I am trying to establish the relationship between various classes of systems which have similar functionalities, with a view to come up with a better defined ontology for our domain This mean, lets try to understand what this 'overlap' consists of It all starts with having solid, agreed upon definitions, which we still working on Here is my reasoning, recently circulated to CMPros which has not yielded any response/comments Proposed definitions for ------------------------------ > Content = Organisational Information and Data collected from internal and > external sources, stored in any format (text, graphical multimedia, > digital and non digital). Content can be structured (documents, records) > and unstructured (discussion groups, bulletin boards) >Document? = Content formatted in a specific file type (.doc versus .pdf) > File type = File extension determined by the software package it is > produced with 4) if the defintions above are true, then documents are content then content management includes document management although document management may require file type specific functionalities Please agree or disagree/comment The above discussion applies to the post below by srinivas/oliver becauz when you think of application development of this sort, you've gotta think lateral I say Unless you have completely ruled out that your documents of today (words and pdfs) will not be your content of tomorrow (html/xml) and viceversa, then you'd be wasting your time thinking of them separately and not as a single application that can handle format independent data Format independent means that anything that the data can be outputted to more than one desired format Dont you think? Paola Di Maio ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Crow" <[email protected]> To: "srinivas mohan" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:35 PM Subject: Re: [OSCOM] Open source CMS > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2005, srinivas mohan wrote: > >> I am very new to CMS concepts.. > ... >> The application i am intrested to build is to manage word and pdf >> documents with support to workflow mgmt and content distribution. > > > This sounds to me like a "document management system" more than a "content > management system". I guess there's a lot of overlap between the two. > > My understanding is that document management systems are primarily > concerned with the production and management of documents. They provide > workflow tools, archival, searching, and are usually agnostic about the > format of the stored content. > > CMSs are primarily concerned with content publishing. They provide many > features similar to document management, and also provide content editing > tools. They typically require that the content be stored in a format > editable and manipulable by the CMS, which usually means not Word or PDF. > > If your application is more about production and management of documents > than it is about publishing documents, perhaps the assumptions and feature > sets found in document management systems would be a better match. > > > Oliver > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > >