JavaDoc conventions
Andreas Hartmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.wyona.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Wyona developers, what about specifying some JavaDoc conventions? I would propose that at least every public method that is committed to CVS should have a documentation that covers all the effects of the method, even if it is just a getter or setter. If the parameters and return values are not absolutely self-explanatory, we should add @param and @return tags. A comprehensive guide to JavaDoc can be found at http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/writingdoccomments/index.html. In my eyes, missing or insufficient JavaDocs are one of the most frustrating matters when I'm trying to use foreign code. And badly commented code looks - at least in my eyes - quite incomplete and not very trustworthy (just a prejudice?). Recently I noticed that in most cases I start with the JavaDoc when I'm writing code - sometimes it turns out that I wasn't really conscious of the purpose of a method :) What do you think? Andreas