AW: XOpus

"Scherler, Thorsten" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:57:57 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.wyona.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello group,

sorry but I can't understand it!!!!!

1. it's open source since 2 month! Before that time there were planing to go open source for how long 6 month, or more? All the arguments that they brought forward are arguments against OpenSource (OS), that's for sure! But this arguments have been always there (during 6 month) and will be.

2. Fair enough to hope to get more projects by going open source. But is that a reason to go OpenSource? It's a HOPE! And ->1. 2 month only! On Television this is maybe possible!

...

But they have decided! 

...so I will support Bitflux!

King Regards

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jann Forrer [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. November 2002 09:21
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Wyonacms-users] XOpus



Ciao list members

I can also understand the reasons of q42 for not  releasing new
Xopus versions to the Open Source community.

However, I have another comment concerning WYSIWYG editor's. We have
tested Bitflux and Xopus and I belive that at the moment it is crucial
to have a form based editor available within a CMS (at least as a
fall back system). This is escpecially true on an University where you
have all kinds of browsers and operating system in use.

By the way, there are quite nice editors around as a demonstration of the
ETH, which use Silva, has shown.

Jann

---------------------------------------------------------------
Jann Forrer
Informatikdienste
Universität Zürich
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zuerich

oooO   mail:  [email protected]
(  )   phone: +41 1 63 56772
 \ (   fax:   +41 1 63 54505
  \_)  http://www.zi.unizh.ch


_______________________________________________
WyonaCMS-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wyona.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wyonacms-users