Re: JCA signers for core missing?

jojodee <jojodee-8nna1qhvBBM9QQeoy3GH/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.devel
Organization Xaraya
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Marcel van der Boom wrote:
> From another thread:
> 
> "...In fact, if the DDF held the copyright and everyone who committed to
> core had signed the copyright..."
> 
>
I think this was just wording on my part when giving an example.

In fact I asked about this very thing this the other night in IRC  but
confirmed there was noone at the current time committing to core without
having signed the JCA (if there is then i guess they'll contact you).

While on this topic, what happens with the modules repository now?
Previously it wasn't 'compulsory' to sign the JCA for modules but
everyone had done, up until recently.

What is your current opinion on this?

>From what you have said in the other copyright thread, if we are going
to continue with the copyright header there it could get very complex.

Jo


> 
> marcel


-- 
http://xarigami.com :: Creative web development with Xaraya
http://2skies.com   :: Open source hosting and development
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.