Re: Re: Xaraya :: Documents :: Contact Information

"Marjolein Katsma" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:Xns93DC8D3FB3814javawoman-eZa9WL4uNvh7QcVyMg8ateG/[email protected]
> Jason Judge wrote in news:bhspq9$f3g$1-111RdWWlOxkOkXtL6OYfHgC/[email protected]:
>
> > Hehe. But it's *obvious*.
>
> It bloody well isnt! ;-) That's two people now who can *read* but simply
> don't find the instructions needed in what they are reading carefully.
>
> It's far from 'obvious' that from several directories provided in the
> zip/tarball only one, named 'html', which doesn't actually contain any
> HTML, is the one you need to install.
>
> > If you've done it before ;-)
>
> After asking on the forum first - which is what I did...!
>
> I added a comment to #1079 ... where amongst noting other things (like
> the non-explanatory nature of the name of the 'html' directory) I
> volunteer to write up a better version of INSTALL.txt, provided someone
> else will actually install that in the downloadable .906 tarball/zip.
> (I.e., NOT just in BK - but in what people download *now*.)

I doubt that will happen. .906 is out there now and so any updates to it
will wait until the next release. It's not being awkward - just the only way
to keep control of versions. However - you could submit an article to
xaraya.com with your installation experiences. You may even get additional
comments that would help refine the install document further. If you do
this, then a link to the article in the bug would also be helpful.

The main bit missing is the explanation that the only necessary files for
your web server are the contents of the 'html' directory. Is that about
right?

-- JJ