Re: Public Sites :: Update

mikespub wrote:
> In article <aoofeg$qe$1-FogMEOs31dotat4ziPANHlKoq+OfwspIAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>, "Doug Daulton \(Apakuni\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>...
[snip]
> So we should make it easy for them to find all the info they need,
> and cross-reference with downloads, specs, RFCs etc.
> So perhaps add the (automatically updated) BL specs, RFCs etc.
> in the Resources as well, or point to a local copy of the /docs dir,
> or place a BIG LINK to the docs site in the main menu ? :)
> 
Definitely agreed here. I wonder if we should publish the Gantt chart, 
as that puts some pressure on us. A roadmap, yes, but possibly not the 
organizational internals.
> 
>>That is it for now.  Stay tuned, we are soon to go public.
>>
>>Doug
> 
> 
> Looks pretty good so far Blah! Bleh! Bloh! :)

I've seen sites with less content.... :-)
Yeah, looks good!

Jan


-- 

......... . .. .. . . ..... .. ..... .. .. ... ... .. . .  ..... ......
  Jan Schrage			 If you eat a live frog in the morning,
  [email protected]      nothing worse will happen to either
  http://jack.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de      of you for the rest of the day.