Re: Xaraya database
Marjolein Katsma <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:12:56 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya News Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marcel van der Boom wrote in news:bh02mj$6ie$1-111RdWWlOxkOkXtL6OYfHgC/[email protected]: >> Put differently, it's not so much the fields themselves that are >> important, but what conclusions can be drawn from them (and from >> Xaraya's behavior in maintaining the database). > Agreed, but that's what we have the content management for. I'm not > sure how, but it should be possible to hook up content to that screen > so it stays attached to the raw table information. If it's not > possible (yet), i'm sure Mike will be interested to add it, or have it > added. Just trying to think with you how to do this as easy as > possible (not to mention that i want the documentation as well ;-) ) Yes and no... It would be nice if this type ofinformation could ultimately be added "internally" in an installation - but then you can look at it only when you've already done an installation. The purpose of my document is primarily to be able to make decisions *before* installation, about whether or not you're going to share database tables between different (sub)sites. So my intention is to have a document that outlines this publically available _as a document_, just like the multi-site installation tutorial is now (and to which I'll add my own third variation - when I've sorted out which tables to share...). And, to have it integrated internally, I'd need to know whether the information is correct in the first place - which is why I put up what I have by now for comment! As to maintainability, that's actually very easy - it's just an HTML document that I re-upload when I've made some changes. :) > Sure, but would you be interested in working with us to get this > information on our site somehow and also maintain it there? That way > it's central. That's the ultimate aim, of course. But it's called 'preliminary' for a reason: for now, there's so much guesswork still, I thought it better to have it at least half-way correct before it goes out to the xaraya.com site. I don't even know whether it's 10% correct or 80% correct or whatever. People wouldn't expect something totally incorrect on the Xaraya site, would they? So I thought it better to keep it in my own sandbox until I'm reasonably sure it's mostly correct and useful! -- Marjolein Katsma * Help with HomeSite/Studio: http://hshelp.com/ * Books for webmasters and webrookies: http://books.hshelp.com/ * Java Woman: http://javawoman.com/