Re: AW: possible bug in ZMSTable 1.6.1 (from ZMS-latest)

Niels Dettenbach <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:56:01 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.zms.devel
Organization Syndicat IT&Internet
Message-ID <12732083.ULTeSoeR1q@gongo>
--nextPart2076523.RvxZq9Cdp1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Am Montag, 28. Januar 2013, 17:22:56 schrieben Sie:
> it is recommended to use the ZMSTable 1.6.18.
...many thanks!
This version worked as expected...

best regards,


Niels.
-- 
 ---
 Niels Dettenbach
 Syndicat IT & Internet
 http://www.syndicat.com
 PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc
 ---
 




--nextPart2076523.RvxZq9Cdp1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=witJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2076523.RvxZq9Cdp1--