[argouml-dev] Moving UML2 activity diagrams forward

For UML2 activity diagrams I halted for a while thinking about how to
apply notations. I think the notations are an incredibly important
subsystem as they remove knowledge of both GEF and so will help with
any move to a different diagram implementation should it be required
in future.

I have prepared something on the wiki regarding how I would like to
see notations split out into its own module and improved -
http://argouml.tigris.org/wiki/Notation_Architecture

I'd appreciate any feedback.

I propose to leave the old notation architecture in place while this
is developed for the UML2 activity diagram only.

Once this is working I'll move the state diagram forward to a similar
level of functionality and move any common code for state and activity
into another shared module.

Regards

Bob

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2717692

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]