Re: Is ConnectorJ 5.0 production ready?

Mark Matthews <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.mysql.java
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Raymond wrote:
> The mysql.com web site is inconsistent on whether  Connector J 5.0 is
> the recommended production version.  In some places it recommends 5.0,
> other places it recommends 3.1
> 
> Is 5.0 ready for prime time?  What is the official Mysql response?
> 
> What's the feedback from early adopters of 5.0?    Is it ready? Are
> there features to watch out for or turn off.
> 
> For example, prepared statements can now be prepared by the server and
> reused.  Does this work well?
> 
> For example, setTimeout() appears to be implemented.  Seems like there
> could be some edge cases.
> 

Eric,

We (MySQL AB) feel it's production ready, and it has been in testing as
a beta for quite some time. We have had customers using it in production
systems before it was declared production-ready as well.

I had thought the web team had taken care of making sure all links that
mention 3.1 were now updated to reflect the fact that 5.0 is production,
so I'd be grateful if you could point out the text and/or links that are
still talking about 3.1

Thanks!

	-Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+Ih0tvXNTca6JD8RAoa3AKCRBNkgJKh+ry50LqP422HGBYRMSgCfWlCH
3lVnCyqqOyRMZ7wn6x/22c8=
=XWlI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
MySQL Java Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/java
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.