Re: TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?

I had to turn it off. It became too annoying especially during the
development phase when things are generally a mess. When I'm all done
coding, I use  Code Analyzer. Also, many of the rules are problematic. For
example:

      c_aff_key_username_nomatch     CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := -20013;
      aff_key_username_nomatch                EXCEPTION;
      PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT (aff_key_username_nomatch, -20013);

It tells me that aff_key_username_nomatch is not referenced when it is
referenced in the very next line.

Still, it DOES catch problems, so I do use it while wishing it was smarter.
:-)

Mike


On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Gregory Liss <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
>
>  We don't have a "ignore this rule" or "ignore this instance" feature
> yet…yet.   That sounds like a good one for the Idea Pond!****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Wendy
> Penfold
> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2011 03:59 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [toad] TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?****
>
> ** **
>
> Cool...I'm not getting the mouse over, but I can right click and see the
> rule violation.  Is there anyway I can get the blue squiggles to turn off
> once I've reviewed it without turning the feature off entirely?
>
> On 10/10/2011 3:35 PM, Gregory Liss wrote: ****
>
>   ****
>
> It's not that it doesn't like it.  Well it kind of doesn't like it.  That's
> the new Code Analysis feature.  If you mouse over the blue squiggles, it'll
> show you what rule has been violated.  Also, if you right click on the blue
> squiggles, you'll see a menu item or Rule Violations and you can get a
> detailed explanation of what it doesn't like.  The blue squiggles don’t
> affect the ability to compile but do show you some possible issues in the
> "best practices" world.****
>
>  ****
>
> Greg****
>
> (squiggle dumb).****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
> *On Behalf Of *Wendy Penfold
> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2011 02:54 PM
> *To:* ToadList
> *Subject:* [toad] TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi, I just upgraded to 11.0.0.116 and Toad seems to not like the FOR
> statement in this proc...although the package compiles ok.
>
> ****
>
>  
>