RE: TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?

Wendy,

An alternative is to define a custom rule set where the "FOR" rule is not included, and select that as your default rule set in the editor.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gregory Liss
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 4:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [toad] TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?


We don't have a "ignore this rule" or "ignore this instance" feature yet...yet.   That sounds like a good one for the Idea Pond!

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wendy Penfold
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 03:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [toad] TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?

Cool...I'm not getting the mouse over, but I can right click and see the rule violation.  Is there anyway I can get the blue squiggles to turn off once I've reviewed it without turning the feature off entirely?

On 10/10/2011 3:35 PM, Gregory Liss wrote:

It's not that it doesn't like it.  Well it kind of doesn't like it.  That's the new Code Analysis feature.  If you mouse over the blue squiggles, it'll show you what rule has been violated.  Also, if you right click on the blue squiggles, you'll see a menu item or Rule Violations and you can get a detailed explanation of what it doesn't like.  The blue squiggles don't affect the ability to compile but do show you some possible issues in the "best practices" world.

Greg
(squiggle dumb).

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wendy Penfold
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 02:54 PM
To: ToadList
Subject: [toad] TOAD doesn't like FOR statement?

Hi, I just upgraded to 11.0.0.116 and Toad seems to not like the FOR statement in this proc...although the package compiles ok.

[cid:[email protected]]