Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
David Fetter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now. > > > > There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB, > > etc.) > > Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have > multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature. I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY* thin slice to be claiming. > Also, are there other *SQL* implementations? Yep. You can run SQL in parallel atop Hadoop. Also: https://shardquery.com/2014/02/25/shard-query-supports-background-jobs-query-parallelism-and-all-select-syntax/ Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy