Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/29/2016 11:46 AM, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: >>>> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now. >>> >>> There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB, >>> etc.) >> >> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have >> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature. > > I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY* > thin slice to be claiming. Yeah, it's certainly not terribly marketable. "First non-sharded parallel query". -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy