Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
David Fetter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:06:43PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 08/29/2016 11:46 AM, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > >>>> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now. > >>> > >>> There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB, > >>> etc.) > >> > >> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have > >> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature. > > > > I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY* > > thin slice to be claiming. > > Yeah, it's certainly not terribly marketable. "First non-sharded > parallel query". PostgreSQL: we don't charge you a network hop to use another core ;) Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy