Re: [Fwd: FreeTDS for MS VC++ 2010]

OK, I do not send, that FreeTDS project must support just MS VC++
 From the begining I am speaking as man, who is not C/C++ programer,
I came from FreePascal comunity and I need build dblib.dll to use it in 
FreePascal.
So I have searched the way "HOW TO DO IT IN WINDOWS?"
If there will be some tutorial (step by step) how to do it, then no 
problem I will follow them (I will download, install other compiler than 
MS VC++)
May be, that for experienced C++ developer is all clear/simple and my 
point of view is "strange" or "pointless", then please excuse me.
-Laco.

> as a user, i'd prefer if freetds concentrated on Makefiles.  dead ends such
> as the one you've run into simply wouldn't exist: anyone can patch a Makefile
> to support new, incompatible tools.  OTOH it seems that VC 2010 renders
> the work put into producing and "maintaining" the ds[pw] files wasted.
>
> the notion that an OSS project should shovel energy (no matter how little)
> into opaque files used by a third-party commercial tool which introduces
> incompatibilities with each version just doesn't seem reasonable to me,
> especially when those opaque files aren't *required* to use the project with
> said third-party tool.
>
> IOW, i support the argument jkl made in reply to one of your emails:
>
>   
>> Supporting the Windows development environment is a bit of a nuisance --
>> no offence intended! -- for a free software project because the setup is
>> so variable.  I wrote the FreeTDS NMakefile specifically to compile db-lib
>> regardless of the version of Visual Studio anyone might happen to use.  I
>> don't know now portable it really is, or if anyone uses it, but at least
>> if problems are found it can be patched.  A .dsw or .sln  or .vcproj file
>> cannot be patched, and likely as not won't work anyway.  Just the other
>> day I tried to compile APL for Windows and VS complained the project file
>> was for a newer version.  No simple remedy there.
>>     
>
>