Re: [Fwd: FreeTDS for MS VC++ 2010]

> I understand the attraction of Microsoft's dev tools; they make one of the
> better debuggers I've ever used, and the class browser has gone from
> pathetic to pretty nifty in only 10 years.  Although is truly ridiculous
> that in 2010 we can't get a list of functions that call a function or of
> places where a variable is written to.  
>
>   
Ok, I do not say, that MS VC is bad or good, I do not prefer them.
It was the only FREE C++ compiler which I have used before ;-) (I think, 
that it's good in quality of generated code (size,speed))
(I have used VC++ 2005 Express in Firebird SQL Server project, where was 
simple "compile.bat" file and msvc6,7,8 project files, which build all 
in one click ;-))
If you have any other alternative for Windows, then I can use it, no 
problem.

What I am looking for is some tutorial "HOW TO DO IT" for users coming 
from non C/C++ world
(I am speaking here in name of users, who want use FreeTDS in other 
programing languages than C/C++)

> To repeat something I've said before: creating an MS VS xx project for
> FreeTDS falls under Know Thy Tools.  For the experienced developer, it's
> child's play.  Really!  Anyone who's ported VMS or Unix code to Windows
> knows the drill.  Anyone who hasn't, must learn; if they find it daunting,
> they'll soon discover that's the least of their difficulties.  
>   
I believe, but I am not experienced C++ developer

> What we do here on this list is develop the FreeTDS libraries.  We strive
> to write portable code that can be compiled anywhere, that connects to any
> server, that works as advertised conformant with the vendors'
> specifications.  We include documentation and utilities intended to make
> using FreeTDS as convenient and pleasant as possible.
Yes, thanks for your job

>   We do it for fun. 
> It'd better be fun, because it takes a lot of time.  
>
> Tool and environment issues are definitely less fun.  Autoconf takes care
> of everything except Windows, even AIX, even OS X.  To make Windows
> development about as easy, I wrote the Nmakefile, which I'm happy to
> support or apply patches to.  Every version of VC++ I can think of
> supported a "makefile project" that the Nmakefile could be dropped into.  
>
>   
may be, but all what I can do, is create new empty "makefile project" 
(but does it support importing of your Nmakefile?)

> The Nmakefile also has the salient benefit of being readable.  Anyone who
> wants to know how all the pieces link together can, given time and
> patience, read it to find out.  Anyone who does so will become a better
> programmer and even perhaps one day contribute to the project.  The person
> who requires a push-button eyes-closed just-make-it-work-for-me
>   
;-)))

> wrapped-in-ribbon project file will never do either of those things.  Him
> I can't help.  
>
>
> Thanks for listening.  
>   
Thanks for your time.
I believe, that you are right.
(If there is way how to help users building FreeTDS under windows, then 
IMHO it will be welcomed)

-Laco.